This is ridiculous.
I’ve been studying for the patent agent exam for a few months, and have just finished doing a once-over on just about everything.
It is a mess of poorly written literature. It sucks.
Now, as I go through my second pass of studying, I’m going to take what I consider to be key nuggets, and spell them out in plain english.
As I write the posts, I’ll list them here. Stay tuned.
- 35 USC 102: Novelty Conditions for Patentability
- 35 USC 103: Conditions for Patentability; Non-obvious subject matter
Related posts:
- is your invention novel enough?:
35 USC 102 in plain english - is your invention non-obvious? 35 USC 103 in plain english
- 37 CFR 10 in plain english
Article by chris loughnane
Chris is Design Engineer + Sustainability Advocate at a Boston area design consultancy and has written 127 sweet posts for the Product Development Notebook.
Need a regular fix of product design goodness? Subscribe via RSS or Email to keep up with the latest posts!
The Product Development Notebook runs the Thesis Wordpress Theme.
posts via email:
Pingback: is your invention novel enough?:35 USC 102 in plain english | Product Design Notebook
Pingback: 37 CFR 10 in plain english | Product Development Notebook
Pingback: is your invention non-obvious? 35 USC 103 in plain english | Product Development Notebook