Recently I had occasion to dive into mold-making techniques in order to resolve a conflict with a molder about where the parting line (where two parts of a mold meet) on a side action would be. It had been a bit since I had thought deeply about cam/pin interactions vs. straight pull side actions, so I dug through some old notes and found written by Mark Scanlan of PFA.
It’s written from the perspective of a tool-maker so it occasionally wanders into the esoteric (want to know what happens when pressure plastically deflects the steel core during the injection cycle?), but at 8 pages between the two PDFs, it’s a quick read.
And valuable. If you are using a low-rent molder they might push you towards a cam/pin action which, while it is sometimes the best call, has less flexibility with witness lines than a straight pull.
If you don’t follow that last sentence, don’t worry. Mark explains it better. Not only that, he ends with recommendations like this:
Use compression fit/zero movement cylinder only (requires full hydraulic pressure during injection) or the modular core compression side-action systems previously discussed (where hydraulics are not needed during injection) for:
• All high quality part requirements.
• Core areas greater than 0.5 square inches.
• Long stroke cores.
• Equal exposed core face to body areas.
• Moderate to small slide cross sections.
• Slide lengths greater than 2″.
• Off parting line cores.
• Cores angled to the parting line.
• Core movement prior to mold opening.
Nice.
To read the articles in their entirety, hit the jump.
Related posts:

posts via email:
Pingback: how side actions work: two brief videos | Product Development Notebook